Showing posts with label abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abuse. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 August 2014

It's not OK to hit a porn star stupid

This is fucking disgusting:


This is disgusting for two reasons, firstly the hitting and beating people is never OK; especially if that person is your partner. Violence is wrong; period.

The fact that it happened against a porn actress is irrelevant which brings me succinctly onto the second reasons this is so fucking disgusting; the reactions of the people who’ve commented on this on Twitter: it’s wrong ‘even though’ she’s a porn actress – WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU MEAN ‘EVEN THOUGH’ NOOOOOOOOOOOO; I MEAN FUCKING NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, punching people is wrong, beating people is wrong; the profession of the victim has nothing and I mean nothing to do with how unacceptable it is, I cannot emphasise exactly how ‘GRRRRRRRRRR’ I feel on this matter.

Porn stars need loving personal relationships too: what they do must be emotionally exhausting, so they need a special someone to be there for them just as much (and probably more so) than the rest of us. The fact that they have sex on camera doesn't mean that they will be unfaithful to their romantic partners.  If you think being porn star makes someone scum: YOU SHOULDN'T WATCH PORN; you also need to Google the word ‘hypocrisy’.

Sex work is work, sex workers deserve respect.
Stigma Kills (just like it almost did here).
Rant over. That is all.

Sunday, 13 April 2014

Why we should all support the creation of a National Social Care Service

With people living longer who are sick, funding social care is very hard. One of the actions of the current government which is very controversial is the way that they propose to fund the care of the elderly. According to The Telegraph 340,000 people entitled to home help will soon get none.
It doesn’t surprise me when I hear horror stories about the way people in care area treated. When the state cannot afford to provide a public service they often sub-contract it out to a for profit agency, usually the one who claims they can do it while charging the government the least. The result of this is people working for private care providers aren’t properly trained because the company operates on a ‘for profit’ basis; so any training beyond the bare necessities is in their eyes a waste of money, and cuts into their balance sheet.
This is also why people working for private care companies are often not paid well. I am personally aware of 3 legal loopholes that are used to avoid paying the national minimum wage to people working for private care companies in the area where I live.
The first is regards to agency work, a care home will need people to cover a shift and will ask a temp agency to provide the cover offering the NMW to the worker sent, of which the agency wants a ‘finder’s fee’ which they deduct from the already minimum wage.
The second is regards to community care; a care worker is working an 8 hour shift (for example), but they are informed that they are only ‘at work’ when they are actually inside a client’s home, the time spent travelling from 1 clients home to another counts as travelling to work, not work itself – so the worker gets paid a fraction of what they actually work. When the cost of keeping a car on the road is factored into this equation such employment becomes almost pointless, earning a few pounds per week above what they would be entitled to on state benefits.
The final one is regards to working night shifts at some elderly residential homes. At night most people would expect a worker to get a wage enhancement for working anti-social hours, but no… there are some care homes which don’t do this, in fact they don’t even pay night staff a ‘wage’, they pay them an ‘on call rate’ after the residents have gone to bed which is a fraction of the minimum wage and enhance their pay to the NMW for each our that a resident is disturbed or in need of assistance.
So I cannot help but wonder if any subcontracting of state care to private companies will inevitably result in abuse or mal-treatment due to poor training, and poor conditions. Care is a high-responsibility job, yet many carers are paid low wages… well no: the minimum wage of for minimum responsibility jobs, the major high-street supermarkets pay people a few pence an hour above the NWM to stack shelves, some of the smaller chains pay over a pound an hour above the minimum wage. And yet if someone wants to work in care, they have to have the lives of vulnerable and sick people put into their hands for a pittance? Where I ask in the incentive to do that I can’t help but wonder?

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Pussy Riot member on hunger strike



I think that it’s important that everyone who can spare a few minutes takes the time to read this shocking account of life inside a Russian jail.

I’ve heard this quote attributed to everybody from Churchill to Ghandi, so I’m not quite sure who first said it but it’s good advice no matter who said it (evidenced by the fact that some may people seem to have said it):

If you want to judge how civilised a nation is; look at how they treat their prisoners’


Wednesday, 31 July 2013

My take on the right to die debate

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/judges-reject-assisted-suicide-appeal-091541993.html#H60F57C

Although I agree that a person should have the right to die if they desperately want to and their life is unbearable, I don't see how the patients will be protected from feeling bullied by family members who treat there disabled relatives as a burden and try to bully them into asking the doctor to be euthanized with the pretence of well-meaning sentiment like 'don't you think it's time for you to go'. I recall in GCSE history a Nazi propaganda piece of a disabled woman being 'persuaded' by her husband that euthanasia would be in her interests. So how long would it be before 'right to die' would be seen by carers who want to get on with their lives as a 'duty to die' and look down on people as selfish who decide they want to live on? This is one civil liberty which is yes needed, but also open to the most serious abuse when people realise there interests conflict with those of the people they are supposed to be looking after. So how much of this would be ‘I want to die’ compared with ‘My family would be better off without me’.